I've been a wine appreciator for nearly 50 years and have tasted nearly all of the varietals, styles and countries of origin wines that the world has to offer. From those I have had many preferences that I have marketed, bought, sold, collected and drunk and have been lucky enough to have tasted some very special wines and vintages.
As I've grown older Her Indoors and I have narrowed our preferences down to favourites.
My favourites are:
- Champagne
- Pinot Noir
- Chardonnay
I still have some preferences like riesling, and rose-styles but generally my purchasing and drinking is from the three favourites.
Within each of the favourites I guess I have some sub loves and hates as follows:
Champagne
- Vintage vs non-vintage
- Champagne vs Methode styles
but, hey when needs must I'll drink non vintage or a good methode.
Chardonnay
- Wooded vs unwooded preferably barrique fermented
- New Zealand vs most other countries unless someone offered me a Burgundy
- Hawkes Bay vs any other region and certainly not Marlborough
Exceptions can be a good Californian or top Australian chardonnay and good vintages from Gisborne, Martinborough, Nelson or Waipara but never Marlborough.
Pinot Noir
- New Zealand first and foremost but occasionally will drink a good French or American pinot noir.
- Waipara as first choice followed by Martinborough, Central Otago and Nelson at a pinch. Sometimes a good Marlborough wine catches my fancy.
Following these favourites and some of my preferences leads me to buying my wines on-line from a few reliable sellers or waiting for supermarket wine sales where I do pick up bargains.
The problem with my choice of favourites though is that I've gravitated to the most expensive categories of wines especially when seeking out good examples.
If my favourites were those godawful sauvignon blanc and pinot gris I'd be able to save a lot of money as these white varietals are among the cheapest and most promoted. In reds pinot noir is on average the most expensive, certainly much more than well made merlot, cabernet sauvignon or shiraz wines. If I'd developed a taste for non-methode type sparkling then there would be plenty of bargains for me out there as well.
Hoisted by my own petard I guess.
4 comments:
Well, given that 'turning water into wine' was most likely a euphemism for peeing into a bottle I would imagine that Jesus' wine description is:
Colour: Pale yellow with green tinges. A little bit of spritz showing.
Nose: Pungent 'cat's pee' character not unlike sauvignon blanc.
Taste: Funky and full-bodied with a lingering omnipresent quality.
Oh! I didn't know that Richard was there.
I DID NOT mix lemonade into that wine!
That's not what I was inferring.
Post a Comment